32 mr. a attarked mr. b with a knife. mr. b ran away and jumped into the river to avoid mr . as attacked. mr. b drawned and died. what | Question AI (2024)

Table of Contents
Question Answer Explanation
Home/Law/

32 Mr. A attarked Mr. B with a knife. Mr. B ran away and jumped into the river to avoid Mr . As attacked. Mr. B drawned and died. What crime is committed by Mr. A if there is any? A. Mr. A is not liable for the death of Mr. B because he did not inflict any injury upon Mr. B. B. Mr. A is liable only for grave threats having inflicted no injury upon Nir. B . C. Mr. A is not liable for the death of Mr. B because the drowning of latter was an efficient intervening cause. D. Mr. A is liable for the death of Mr. B because the proximate cause of the latter's death was his chasing him with a knife. 33. That cause, which, in the natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient intervening cause, produces the injury without which the result would not have cocured. A. Proximate cause C. Immediate cause B. Efficient Intervening cause D. Probable cause 34. Mr.A with intent to coerce Mr. B gave Mr. B a fist blow causing the latter to fell on the grounct with his head hitting i hard pavement causing his death. Is Mr. A liable for the death of Mr. 8 ? A. Yes, this is a mistaken identity c. ND , this is a mistake of fact. B. Yes, this is a preater intentionem. D. No, there was no intent to kill. 35. The following are elements of lmpossible crime, EXCEPT: 3. That the act performed would be an offense against persons or property. B. That the act was done with evil intent C. That its accomplishment is inherently impossible, or that the means employed is either inadequate or ineffectual D. That the act does not constitute a crime of nepligence or impcudence. 36. X tried to kill Y by putting in his food a substance which he thought was an arsenic (poison) when in fact it was just some sugar. Y was not killed as a consequence. A. Mistake in the blow C. preaterintentionem B. No crime committed D impossible crime 37. Whenever a court has knowledge of any act which it may deem proper to repress and which is not punishable by law, it shall: A. Render the proper decision, and shall report to the Chief Executive, through the Department of Justice. B. Dismiss the case and shall report to the Chief Executive, through the Department of Justice. C. Render the proper decision, and shall report to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. D. Dismiss the case and shall report to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Caurt. 38. Is that portion iphase) of the acts constituting the crime, starting from the point where the offender begins the commission of the crime to that point where he has still control over his acts including their (acts) natural course. A. Subjective Phase C. Internal Ait B. Objective Phase D. Act of Execution 39. Mr. Bean with art intent to kill his wile, went to a grocery and buy some Dora rat killer and M uriatic Acid, as he was abou: to go home, a police arrested him for attempted parricide Is the police right in arresting Mr. Beam? A. Yes, for there is at act of execution. B. Yes, for there is a clear intention. C. No, because mere preparstory act is not punishable as a general rule D. No, because there is no proof that he will use Dora cat killer. 40. Which of the following is NOT a Factor in determining stage of execution of felony? "MEN" A. Nature of the affense; c. Elements constituting the felony. B. Marmer of commiting the felony 0. Intent in committing the crime. 41. These are crimes which do not have stages. It is committed by a single act or consummated in one instance. (Examples are bribery, physical injury, seduction, abduction, adultery and concuhinage). A. material crimes C. formal crimes B. informal crimes D. impossible crimes 42. This takes place when the offender cammences that commission of a felony by overt acts, and does not perlorm all the acts of execution which should produce the felony by reason of some cause or accident other than his vwn spontarieous desistance. A. Consummated C. Frustrated B. Attermpted D. Impossible Crime 43. A with intent to kill a imed his gurt at B. A did not know that the gun was empty. As a result, when he pressed the triger it did not fire. What crime was committed by & ? A. No crime C. Attempted felony B. Irripossible crime D. Attempted homicide 44. The following are the elements of frustrated felonies, EXC.EPT: A. The offender performs all the acts of execution B. All the acts performed would produce the felony as a consequence but the felony is not produced. C. By reason of causes independent of the will of the perpetrator D. Due to some cause or accident other done his own spontaneous desistance. 45. X with intent to kill stabbed Y from the back upon passing a dark alley inflicting a mortal wound. X in an attempt to make a second attack decided to tum his back leaving Y . What crime was ull text: 29500 C. Consummated murder D. Serious Physical njury

Answer

4.5(116 votes)

32 mr. a attarked mr. b with a knife. mr. b ran away and jumped into the river to avoid mr . as attacked. mr. b drawned and died. what | Question AI (2)

Sarah TorresVeteran · Tutor for 9 years

Answer

<br />32. D<br />33. A<br />34. B<br />35. D<br />36. D<br />37. A<br />38. A<br />39. C<br />40. D<br />41. C<br />42. B<br />43. D<br />44. D<br />45. C

Explanation

<br />1. The question revolves around legal concepts related to criminal liability and the classification of crimes. It requires an understanding of legal principles such as proximate cause, stages of execution of a felony, and the classification of crimes.<br /><br />2. In question 32, the legal issue is whether Mr. A is liable for the death of Mr. B. The key concept here is the proximate cause of death. If Mr. A's actions were the direct and substantial cause of Mr. B's death, he could be held liable.<br /><br />3. Question 33 deals with the definition of legal terms related to causation in criminal law. Understanding the distinctions between these terms is crucial for determining liability in criminal cases.<br /><br />4. Question 34 examines the concept of liability in a situation where death resulted from actions that were not intended to kill. This involves understanding the legal principle of "praeter intentionem," which refers to a result that exceeds the intention of the actor.<br /><br />5. Question 35 focuses on the elements of an impossible crime, a legal concept where the crime could not have been accomplished due to inherent impossibility or ineffectiveness of the means employed.<br /><br />6. Question 36 involves the classification of a crime where the intended harmful result did not occur due to the harmlessness of the means used. This relates to the concept of an impossible crime.<br /><br />7. Question 37 discusses the procedural aspect of what a court should do when it encounters an act that is not punishable by law but is deemed necessary to repress.<br /><br />8. Question 38 is about the phases of committing a crime, specifically the distinction between the subjective and objective phases in the execution of a crime.<br /><br />9. Question 39 deals with the legal assessment of preparatory acts in the context of attempted crimes, specifically in the scenario of attempted parricide.<br /><br />10. Question 40 asks about the factors considered in determining the stage of execution of a felony, focusing on the nature of the offense, manner of committing the felony, elements constituting the felony, and intent.<br /><br />11. Question 41 is about the classification of crimes that are consummated by a single act and do not have stages of execution.<br /><br />12. Question 42 discusses the concept of an attempted felony, where the offender begins the commission of a felony but does not complete it due to external factors.<br /><br />13. Question 43 examines the classification of a crime where the offender intends to commit a felony but fails due to the ineffectiveness of the means used.<br /><br />14. Question 44 focuses on the elements of frustrated felonies, where the offender performs all the acts of execution but the felony is not produced due to independent causes.<br /><br />15. Question 45 deals with the classification of a crime where the offender inflicts a mortal wound with the intent to kill but then desists from further action.

Does the answer help you? Rate for it!

You might be interested

Explore more questions

  • In the Legal Composition of Crime, what does "actus reus" refer to?a. Criminal intentb. Outward movement tending to produce effectc. Mental stated. Desire or motiveSee Answer05/27/2024
  • What is an operating system?a. interface between the hardware and application programsb. collection of programs that manages hardware resources Read Only Memoryc. system service provider to the application programsd. Universal Flash DriveSee Answer05/27/2024
  • The following are the elements of Dolo or deceit, EXCEPT:a. Intelligenceb. Intentc. Freedomd. NegligenceSee Answer05/27/2024
  • An ordinary citizen like a household is not part of the metrics of economic growth.a. Trueb. FalseSee Answer05/27/2024
  • What category of kick that extends the leg pushing, foot toward the opponent facing it?a. Side Kickb. Back Stepc. Front Kickd. Back KickSee Answer05/27/2024
32 mr. a attarked mr. b with a knife. mr. b ran away and jumped into the river to avoid mr . as attacked. mr. b drawned and died. what | Question AI (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 5399

Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Birthday: 2000-07-07

Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

Phone: +2556892639372

Job: Investor Mining Engineer

Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.